Canon 5D Mark III price drop!

I recently posted the following note on Facebook: 

Can’t believe the Canon 5D Mark III dropped to $3199 on Amazon already! Only means that they’re gonna go out of stock for weeks on end again after the rush of eager buyers. =] http://bit.ly/canon5d3

One of my readers who has not been following the Canon news then asked, “What makes this camera so good that $3200 is cheap?” Below was my response:

It’s a major upgrade of a professional full-frame camera (true 35mm sensor size, unlike most consumer digital cameras that have a lot smaller of a sensor, and therefore less ability to capture detail at high megapixels and to render a shallow depth of field) that supports ISO 25600 (to be able to shoot in extremely dark places) with one of the most advanced autofocus systems on the market (to help you nail focus in action shots), all wrapped up in serious magnesium alloy body that can take a beating and face the elements while continuing to perform its job. To highlight the cinematic quality of its video capabilities, the previous Canon 5D Mark II and Canon 7D have made its way into Hollywood, being used for episodes of House, the opening of Saturday Night Live, action scenes for The Avengers, and a bunch of other major productions, and I can only imagine the Mark III will continue the trend. All to say, if you’re serious about photography and videography, this camera is a serious contender, especially when coupled with a 9% price drop from MSRP merely 4 months after its release. If everything described here sounds like, “Blah blah blah, blah blah blah,” then you probably don’t need to worry about it and would be more than happy with the also-very-capable Canon T3i for $579! http://bit.ly/canot3i

Can you think of any other major points and counterpoints? Check out other user reviews for the Canon 5D Mark III at http://bit.ly/canon5d3

[sc:ask]

Canon EOS 5D Mark III DSLR: Super Quick Review

The Canon 5D Mark III is out, but is it worth it? Back in 2009, I still remember agonizing over the decision whether to buy the Canon 5D Mark II DSLR for months. Fast forward 3 years and tens of thousands of photos later, I can easily say I have no regrets about moving forward. That camera pretty much spoiled me with its high performance and amazing image quality. It made me want to become a better photographer, and I can never look back. The Canon 5D Mark III raises the standard again, and here are the main points I considered: 

What I love:

  • Excellent low light performance: The Canon 5D Mark III is rated to support ISO 25600, due to its 35mm full frame format. While in my testing it seems like ISO 25600 is really pushing it (and there is a lot of grain at that setting) , the camera does allow for very usable images up to ISO 6400. I can usually easily handhold my shots without flash even in a dim interior.
  • 22-megapixels is huge and means I have a lot of leverage to do creative cropping in Adobe Lightroom 4 when I need it to improve a shot’s composition. Even very aggressive crops result in very large and usable images. Photography is not all about megapixel count, but it does matter if you’re likely to crop heavily while retaining fine detail. 
  • The new 61-point autofocus system is world-class. This was one of the big complaints about the 5D Mark II (which only had an outdated 9-point AF system). Canon has finally upgraded this, and it is amazingly powerful. It takes some study and practice to leverage its power, but the effort is worthwhile for tack-sharp images.
  • The shooting mode dial lock is awesome! (Now you have to intentionally push down on the center button of the dial before you can rotate it.) I used to hate it when I carry two cameras at a event shoot like a wedding, and in the course of the cameras brush against me, the mode changes from Manual or Aperture Priority to something random and I mess up a few shots before I realize what’s going on! Say goodbye to that problem!
  • The 6 fps continuous shooting mode is about 50% faster than the 5D Mark II. It is good enough for me to shoot sports, kids, pets, etc., and capture the peak action. When I need to shoot action, I usually set the camera to 1/500-1/1000s shutter speed, center-point focus with expanded focus points, and AI-SERVO autofocus. The ability to reprogram the Depth of Field (DOF) Preview to instantly switch over to AI-SERVO mode is also a great improvement.
  • Auto ISO finally works in Manual Mode (M). Now you can set your aperture and shutter, and let the camera figure out the matching ISO to give you the “correct” exposure. This may seem stupid to some professional shooters, but it’s a welcome change to me. It never made sense why setting it to Auto in the past meant it would “automatically” set it to ISO 400 only.
  • The camera finally supports 60fps in 720p recording mode, a headphone jack to monitor your audio, as well as the ability to seamlessly record movies longer than 4GB will fit.There is also a dedicated movie switch (like the Canon 7D) rather than the cumbersome system we put up with in the 5D Mark II.

What still irks me:

  • ISO 25600 is pretty ugly and grainy to me. The fact that I can get very usable images at ISO 6400 is already amazing, but I don’t personally understand why the manufacturer claims a much higher number when it looks really bad. (Tip: At high ISOs, I tend to actually overexpose the image by up to 1-stop, and then bring it back down in post-processing, which seems to work much better to control the noise than to underexpose the image in camera and then try to bring up the exposure in post.) 
  • I actually don’t like the placement of the zoom button. It has moved to the left side and is taking some getting used to. I wish they at least kept the zoom in/out functionality on the right side of the back of the camera as well, because that’s what I continue to push out of muscle memory!
  • The price for all of these new features and improvements in the 5D Mark III is a whopping $1000 more than the list price of the 5D Mark II. Ouch!

Conclusion

All in all, there were some major improvements and very little to complain about. Canon listened to their customers and gave them much of what was still lacking in the 5D Mark II. This is pretty amazing camera for anyone serious about photography and video, so if you can part with the cash, there’s very little to not like here, which explains why it’s been constantly out of stock everywhere when it was first released. For those who are not doing photography and videography professionally, you may also want to consider the very capable (and significantly less expensive!) Canon Rebel T3i

You can also check out sample shots from the Canon 5D Mark III at http://www.kennethphotography.com/category/canon-5d-mark-iii

Buy it now or check out other user reviews! Canon 5D Mark III on Amazon

[sc:ask]

Micro 4/3 cameras for Patagonia trip?

I had a recent email conversation with someone looking for a camera to take with them on vacation to Patagonia, specifically a micro four-thirds camera which mixes smaller form factor with the interchangeable lens systems typically enjoyed by DSLR users. I wanted to share the thread for others who may be similarly interested!

I’m so excited! My next trip is to Patagonia in April! I love the bridge camera I bought last year so I’m not sure I’m ready to upgrade anytime soon, but I hear a lot of buzz of how great the micro 4/3 cameras are! My impression is that you still have to have DSLR skill in terms of knowing how to adjust settings and buying fancy lenses etc… which may be too complicated for me… but I thought I’d check with you to get your opinion…  I may start researching these cameras and maybe get [my boyfriend] one this year since he has a DSLR that he loves using but is so huge and bulky that it’s not that convenient for when we’re traveling! They do seem quite pricey, but I’ve seen some models on Amazon for under $300 though I guess there’s a big range in quality?

Just like bridge cameras, micro four-thirds cameras do fill a gap between full DSLRs and point-and-shoot cameras. The main thing you gain with a micro 4/3 camera is the ability to use different lenses while being smaller than your average DSLR. That’s why it’s the traveling DSLR user’s dream. Of course, it will have some basic Auto features so you can still use it like a point-and-shoot too. A micro 4/3 camera will probably be a bit smaller than a bridge camera, but not necessarily much lighter. I actually suggest going to a Best Buy or something and checking out the size difference. The two most popular brands are Olympus and Panasonic. So for example, see the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 and Olympus PEN E-P3.

In addition to micro 4/3, Sony has their own line of compact system cameras called the NEX series. Since you seem to like Sony, it’s probably worth checking out too. I have a number of friends (both photographers and casual shooters) who have the Sony NEX-5N and love it. If you checked out the links, you’ll probably see that everything costs $700+ for the camera body + one lens. Yes, there are some bodies now selling for $350 or so, but they are first-generation compact system cameras, which in my opinion are outdated and aren’t going to be worthwhile for you to even consider, unless your boyfriend is the type who likes to play around with something just to get an idea if he really cares for it before upgrading. Anyway, hope that helps.

My main suggestions are to check out the links for the reviews and then visit the store to see and get a feel for them in person. I think you’ll have a better idea after that whether it’s worthwhile. (Be sure to try disconnecting the lens and putting it back on when you’re seeing it in person!)

P.S. My wife and I are going to Greece and Italy at the end of April. I’m lugging all of my photo gear. =] 

Thanks, Kenneth! I can’t believe you’re traveling with all your camera stuff! I can’t wait to see the pictures though! 🙂 My newest purchase is one of those compact monopods so I can mount my small tiny point-and-shoot on it and take self-photos with my boyfriend because we’re going to be out in a lot of areas of Patagonia where there won’t be anyone to take photos for us. We’ll see how well it works! 🙂 He’s dragging his DSLR with him but it’s so heavy! He’s talked about micro 4/3’s a couple times so I know he’s interested… but it also seems crazy to spend almost $1000 on a non-DSLR camera! Anyway, thanks for the advice!!!!

A seasoned DSLR-user will understand why these “non-DSLRs” cost about $1000 with basic lenses out the door. That’s the primary target group for this camera, in my opinion. So if you did get it for him, I bet he’d be pretty pleased. =] When you say compact monopod for self-portraits, do you mean something like what I just bought, the Manfrotto 560B? Not quite sure I’ve seen anything else that can stand up by itself, unless you’re talking about those Gorillapods that can wrap around objects!

Haha… I’m sure he would be since he’s been staring at them and mentioning them… Why haven’t you gotten one of these yet? And is your wife ok with your dragging all your photo stuff on vacation? 🙂 I did not by the Manfrotto one… I think I got a tiny one for my point-and-shoot camera from Xshot just for fun… They don’t stand by themselves… it’s basically a camera on the stick. You place the mini monopod on, hold it out, and set the timer on automatic to take your self-portrait. 🙂 I did also get a Gorillapod but I don’t feel like I trust it enough not to go upside down with the weight of the camera on it! Will have to experiment some more with it before Patagonia!

Honestly, between a great compact system camera and a decent DSLR, the DSLR is going to result in the better image quality and performance. I’m not yet at a life stage (with kids, etc) where shedding excess travel weight is terribly important yet. So I’d rather choose high performance gear even if it’s heavier. Further, since I’ve invested a lot of money for the assortment of lenses and gear for my DSLRs, it’s going to be difficult to just shed all of it. Many of my friends with Micro 4/3 cameras say things like, “Oh yeah, I love traveling with my micro 4/3 camera, but if I have to shoot a wedding, I’m still going to use my DSLR.” To me, that seems like a hassle to have two systems to worry about. I have asked my wife before whether she was interested in a compact system, since she hates the weight of a DSLR. We’ll see! 

Have you heard anything about the Nikon N1? Is it a micro 4/3? There was one at the store with interchangeable lenses!

Yeah, I’ve read a bit about the Nikon 1 Series (technically the J1 and V1 cameras). Honestly not that into it. I would estimate it’s better than a point-and-shoot, but underperforms most micro 4/3 cameras, so if you’re going for interchangeable lenses, might as well choose from Olympus, Panasonic, or Sony. 

Hey Kenneth, online I see older models like the Olympus PEN E-PL1 and Panasonic DMC-LX5 that are so much cheaper… Any thoughts on them? I think my boyfriend is considering getting one even before the trip so now he’s looking into them himself!

I think the biggest weakness of the earlier generation units is slow autofocus and poor low-light performance. If those are not big priorities because you’ll mostly shoot outdoors during the day and mostly of scenery or people standing still, then you will probably like these units just fine (and feel good about paying about 1/2 the price of the latest units!). But even when I say slow autofocus and poor low-light performance, it’s still going to be way better than your average point-and-shoot.

Decisions, decisions! =]

[sc:ask]

Need a new external flash

Had a question about using a name-brand vs. generic external flash to attach to this reader’s DSLR. I wanted to share the thread for others who may be similarly interested!

  • I want to buy the nikon SB600 it should be compatible with D90 and does it use 4 AA? What do you think would a generic flash work just as well? what do you think?

I’ve heard good things about the Nikon SB600. The main question is whether you will be inclined to bring it with you when you are shooting portraits outside of home. It definitely makes the camera a lot heavier! This often comes as a surprise to photographers getting into flash photography.

Another alternative is to try a simple flash diffuser for about $15. This wraps around your built-in flash. Results are likely not as good, but certainly easier to carry and cheaper to try. 

  • I think it is OK. I have used the Sunpak 400 attached to hot shoe and the camera is not overweight. Let me see if I can find out the weight for the SB600. The $15 diffuser are you talking about attaching to the pop up flash?

Yes, the $15 diffuser just attaches to the pop-up flash. But it sounds like you are pretty interested in external flash. =] The Nikon SB600 is about 10 oz. without batteries.

  • You are right. I just saw some videos on lighting and I notice that the wedding or portrait photographer have 2 -4 remote slave flash units. I like the idea of bounce up down and all around lighting. One guy used blue gel and some glasses to create a blue background, it was cool.

Yup, you can do that for portraits too. In this photo, the wall was actually white, but we made it magenta with a 2nd flash with a gel: http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=38114630&l=ce4febea04&id=201655

If you mostly want to do bounce flash, you might also want to look into the Lightscoop modifier product, which bounces your popup flash into the ceiling. Pretty simple $25 concept, but I’ve also heard quite a few people are happy with it. But of course, if you’re looking to recolor background walls, and other fancy tricks, you’re going to have to investing in at least one external flash (and a pack of colored gels to mount on the flash).

 

[sc:ask]

DSLR Recommendations: Nov 2011

I often meet amateur photographers who are looking into digital SLR (DSLR) camera systems for the first time, so I’m always interested in making meaningful recommendations. Here’s a recent email thread I was part of, shared here for the benefit of others who are also looking to get into DSLR photography!

  • Kenneth, what kind of camera would you recommend? Is the T3i is good?

Here are my primary recommendations these days for getting started with a DSLR:

* You already seem to know the Canon Rebel T3i is one of the best entry-level DSLR on the market right now. It has the same processor as the much more expensive Canon 7D, which results in great low-light performance and full HD video. It’s currently $772 with the 18-55mm kit lens.
* If you want a little better quality, you may want to just get the T3i without lens, and then get the Canon 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 as a very good standard zoom lens. The image stabilization (IS) definitely helps. It’s a heavier lens and costs about $400 on Amazon.  I would generally recommend this as the first or second lens to own.
* The Canon 50mm f/1.8 lens is easily the most affordable low-light and portrait lens available at about $100. If you like shooting indoor photos without disturbing people with flash, this is a good lens to have. Some people shoot with this as their only lens, with the main disadvantage being the lack of zoom range. (If I was starting from scratch, I’d probably get this and the 28-135mm as an excellent combo for most normal situations.)

* If you want a basic SD card recommendation, the Sandisk 16GB Extreme SDHC is a good bet. It’s very fast (class 10) and costs $30.

  • Thanks Kenneth for sharing these helpful information with me. i’ll keep looking these sites for good deal hope will get it soon 🙂  
No problem. Take your time and be careful how you spend your money. =]
 
[sc:ask]